Jophiel wrote:
TirithRR wrote:
I think we're ignoring the huge grey area here where a drunk man and a drunk woman have ***.
Assuming you mean consensual sex (setting aside the question of consent under the influence), that's not what happened in this case so it can be safely ignored.
Technically being drunk voids consent, but if people stopped having sex while drunk we'd have a population crisis.
I doubt Tirith is pro rape, but is probably bothered by post-hoc reflection redefining the act.