Recent Visitors: 101
- Allakhazam's Forums
- Final Fantasy XI Forums
- Final Fantasy XI General Discussion Forum
- This is a Friday thread.....or is it?
Allakhazam IRC: Go visit the #ffxi channel!
Final Fantasy XI General Discussion Forum: Our Main Final Fantasy XI Forum.
Preview: the silliest, most convoluted, AV "theory" ever?
There have been lots of "theories" about defeating Absolute Virtue over the years. Here's mine. This'll take a while, though; so grab a sandwich or something.....
...okay, here goes.
This theory started fairly simply. The name of the creature itself. Absolute Virtue. To me, that means that he is the paragon of morality, honesty, and fair play. Which led me to believe, you will not defeat this creature by cheating.
There's been lots of discussion amongst the player population about whether Windower plugins are considered cheating. However, the opinion of the playerbase--for the purposes of this topic--is irrelevant. SE considers it cheating. And that's what matters here.
But how can they TELL if you're cheating or not? Most of the popular plugins are--for all intents and purposes--undetectable since they only display information that the servers send you anyway.
But then I thought; "what about the other way around"? Do any of them change the way the players send info TO the server? And is it in a way that SE can detect? SE catches bots all the time, don't they?
Now, this part of my theory is definitely the weakest link; since I'm not exactly well-versed in Internet mechanics--I fully expect this part to be shot down in a blaze of technical knowledge. But this is(?) a Friday thread; so have fun with it.
I think it has something to do with Windower macros. Those wonderful things that allow you to make macros of more than six lines (at least that's how I've come to understand it). Now, what do you NEED more than six lines at a time for?
The only thing I can think of (and feel free to clue me in if I'm offbase here) is massive equip swapping. If not for that; I don't think anyone would really need long macros for anything. Whether equip-swaps of this level are necessary or not is another topic altogether; so I won't digress by going down that road.
But this is the "key" to my theory. When you fire off one of these macros, you're sending a huge amount of equip-change commands at a speed and efficiency that cannot be matched by any console-using player. And this is what's being detected. (DISCLAIMER: If it's not totally obvious by this paragraph, I play this game on a console and while I certainly COULD use my PC for it, I choose not to.)
And there are probably not many fights where gear-optimization is considered more "necessary" than the Jailer Of Love fight. (DISCLAIMER: I've only participated in one JOL fight, and my role there was not exactly involved. So I freely admit, I don't have a lot of experience to base this claim on. Happy Friday?)
So, in a way to "catch" and "punish" plug-in users without outright banning them--because we all know what the outcome of banning them would be--Absolute Virtue was created to slap these evil-doers across the face and leave them running for their moogles.
But after a while, SE probably decided "what if NO ONE in the group fighting it is cheating in this way? Maybe we should devise a way to 'reward' their honesty and give the wrong-doers a chance to repent." The infamous "video" of them beating AV is one of the things that resulted from this. Giving AV a loot-pool was another.
One other result was whenever someone devised a way to beat AV, they quickly fixed it. Most of these have been the result of glitches, but the most recent one I remember (KC-DRK zergs) certainly feeds into this theory (beat AV even by cheating).
So, the end product of this entire thing is, next time you use that JOL pop-set; DON'T USE WINDOWER MACROS AT ALL. It might mean your parsers will show some lol-worthy damage numbers or something or other; but in the name of honesty and fair-play, it just might be worth it.
And if it's not, just keep telling yourself that this was only a Happy Friday thread. ("Holy ****, that Q is so out of his mind!")
Just in case you were wondering, I don't REALLY consider my theory to be likely. Mainly because, even with my limited knowledge; I can think of at least two ways to "fool" the detection scheme.
There have been lots of "theories" about defeating Absolute Virtue over the years. Here's mine. This'll take a while, though; so grab a sandwich or something.....
...okay, here goes.
This theory started fairly simply. The name of the creature itself. Absolute Virtue. To me, that means that he is the paragon of morality, honesty, and fair play. Which led me to believe, you will not defeat this creature by cheating.
There's been lots of discussion amongst the player population about whether Windower plugins are considered cheating. However, the opinion of the playerbase--for the purposes of this topic--is irrelevant. SE considers it cheating. And that's what matters here.
But how can they TELL if you're cheating or not? Most of the popular plugins are--for all intents and purposes--undetectable since they only display information that the servers send you anyway.
But then I thought; "what about the other way around"? Do any of them change the way the players send info TO the server? And is it in a way that SE can detect? SE catches bots all the time, don't they?
Now, this part of my theory is definitely the weakest link; since I'm not exactly well-versed in Internet mechanics--I fully expect this part to be shot down in a blaze of technical knowledge. But this is(?) a Friday thread; so have fun with it.
I think it has something to do with Windower macros. Those wonderful things that allow you to make macros of more than six lines (at least that's how I've come to understand it). Now, what do you NEED more than six lines at a time for?
The only thing I can think of (and feel free to clue me in if I'm offbase here) is massive equip swapping. If not for that; I don't think anyone would really need long macros for anything. Whether equip-swaps of this level are necessary or not is another topic altogether; so I won't digress by going down that road.
But this is the "key" to my theory. When you fire off one of these macros, you're sending a huge amount of equip-change commands at a speed and efficiency that cannot be matched by any console-using player. And this is what's being detected. (DISCLAIMER: If it's not totally obvious by this paragraph, I play this game on a console and while I certainly COULD use my PC for it, I choose not to.)
And there are probably not many fights where gear-optimization is considered more "necessary" than the Jailer Of Love fight. (DISCLAIMER: I've only participated in one JOL fight, and my role there was not exactly involved. So I freely admit, I don't have a lot of experience to base this claim on. Happy Friday?)
So, in a way to "catch" and "punish" plug-in users without outright banning them--because we all know what the outcome of banning them would be--Absolute Virtue was created to slap these evil-doers across the face and leave them running for their moogles.
But after a while, SE probably decided "what if NO ONE in the group fighting it is cheating in this way? Maybe we should devise a way to 'reward' their honesty and give the wrong-doers a chance to repent." The infamous "video" of them beating AV is one of the things that resulted from this. Giving AV a loot-pool was another.
One other result was whenever someone devised a way to beat AV, they quickly fixed it. Most of these have been the result of glitches, but the most recent one I remember (KC-DRK zergs) certainly feeds into this theory (beat AV even by cheating).
So, the end product of this entire thing is, next time you use that JOL pop-set; DON'T USE WINDOWER MACROS AT ALL. It might mean your parsers will show some lol-worthy damage numbers or something or other; but in the name of honesty and fair-play, it just might be worth it.
And if it's not, just keep telling yourself that this was only a Happy Friday thread. ("Holy ****, that Q is so out of his mind!")
Just in case you were wondering, I don't REALLY consider my theory to be likely. Mainly because, even with my limited knowledge; I can think of at least two ways to "fool" the detection scheme.
----------------------------
Pluh. Chocoblo wrote:
I wouldn't mind being able to tie two Taru MNKs together and attack with the ferocity of a pair of monkchuks.
Link to this post 23 replies
Posting from The United States of Who Gives A S---?
Posted: Nov 6th 2009 5:09pm | IP: Logged | Reply to this
But when and where does the hope staff wielding PUP come into play?
----------------------------
I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant. I could spend my life having this conversation, so please try to understand before one of us dies.Posting from Garuda
Posted: Nov 6th 2009 5:12pm | IP: Logged | Reply to this
I'm pretty sure some LS with all PS2/XBOX360 players have already attempted to fight JoL and AV. There must be a LS like this somewhere. Anyone has info if I'm correct on this? Or only linkshells where at least one member uses Windower, its plug-ins and other third party applications have attempted to defeat JoL and AV?
My Brute - Valiarius
The FFXI Forum Xeno-Inquisition Reborn!!!!
=10 is serious business is serious.
----------------------------
Aluus wrote:
NOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU EVIL EVIL BASTARD!!!!!!!!
My Brute - Valiarius
The FFXI Forum Xeno-Inquisition Reborn!!!!
=10 is serious business is serious.
Posting from Allakhazam's Headquarters
Posted: Nov 6th 2009 5:14pm | IP: Logged | Reply to this
I can assure you any linkshell that has attempted JoL and AV has members that use windower macros for gear swaps at the very least.
This idea seems ridiculous, but I'd bet my account that no one has tried it.
This idea seems ridiculous, but I'd bet my account that no one has tried it.
----------------------------
http://ffxi.allakhazam.com/profile.xml?163335
Posted: Nov 6th 2009 5:51pm | IP: Logged | Reply to this
Um...
Yea, this best be a joke thread there OP. Kind of a funny idea, but if you're being even 1% serious...

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/pawkeshup
Viddler: http://www.viddler.com/explore/pawkeshup/
UStream: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/pawkeshup-s-gaming-stream
Blog: http://pawkeshup.blogspot.com
Yea, this best be a joke thread there OP. Kind of a funny idea, but if you're being even 1% serious...

----------------------------
MyBrute: http://pawkeshup.mybrute.com YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/pawkeshup
Viddler: http://www.viddler.com/explore/pawkeshup/
UStream: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/pawkeshup-s-gaming-stream
Blog: http://pawkeshup.blogspot.com
Posting from a computer, DUH!
Posted: Nov 6th 2009 6:14pm | IP: Logged | Reply to this
Pawk, quit ruining =10 by posting pictures of guidos.
Dreamsicle Studio - Computer Lineup
Push Button In Case Of Fail
NaNoWriMo 2009: 37,551/50,000
----------------------------
Revenge of Dynamis - BRACE FOR IMPACT Dreamsicle Studio - Computer Lineup
Push Button In Case Of Fail
NaNoWriMo 2009: 37,551/50,000
Posting from the Ban Katie bandwagon
Posted: Nov 6th 2009 7:00pm | IP: Logged | Reply to this
I really want the OP's theory to be dead on. It would be so damn appropriate.
What's the timeline on Windower being released and AV coming into the game?
Occupation: Reckless Red Mage
What's the timeline on Windower being released and AV coming into the game?
----------------------------
Server: Midgardsormr Occupation: Reckless Red Mage
Posted: Nov 6th 2009 7:15pm | IP: Logged | Reply to this
O.o
People are taking this stupid theory seriously? Are you kidding me? No one gets the same amount of gear-swap-spam occurs by hitting multiple macros?
The only reason they do it with Windower is because they can swap more than 6 slots without hitting a second and third macro.
And the guidos are far more relevant than this hair-brained idea...
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/pawkeshup
Viddler: http://www.viddler.com/explore/pawkeshup/
UStream: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/pawkeshup-s-gaming-stream
Blog: http://pawkeshup.blogspot.com
People are taking this stupid theory seriously? Are you kidding me? No one gets the same amount of gear-swap-spam occurs by hitting multiple macros?
The only reason they do it with Windower is because they can swap more than 6 slots without hitting a second and third macro.
And the guidos are far more relevant than this hair-brained idea...
----------------------------
MyBrute: http://pawkeshup.mybrute.com YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/pawkeshup
Viddler: http://www.viddler.com/explore/pawkeshup/
UStream: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/pawkeshup-s-gaming-stream
Blog: http://pawkeshup.blogspot.com
Posting from a computer, DUH!
Posted: Nov 6th 2009 7:16pm | IP: Logged | Reply to this
QSlick wrote:
So, the end product of this entire thing is, next time you use that JOL pop-set; DON'T USE WINDOWER MACROS AT ALL. It might mean your parsers will show some lol-worthy damage numbers or something or other; but in the name of honesty and fair-play, it just might be worth it.
----------------------------
Kanican's Enmity Testing <-- Every FFXI player should know this information.AllisonRedMage wrote:
Also, bsphil, this isn't spam it's from an AOL forum.
Posting from Madison, WI
Quote:
I'm pretty sure some LS with all PS2/XBOX360 players have already attempted to fight JoL and AV.
I'm pretty sure such a LS doesn't even exist. If it did, there's no way it's big enough to make a serious attempt on AV.
Edited, Nov 6th 2009 7:28pm by Fynlar
Posting from Lakshmi
Posted: Nov 6th 2009 7:21pm | IP: Logged | Reply to this
Fynlar wrote:
Quote:
I'm pretty sure some LS with all PS2/XBOX360 players have already attempted to fight JoL and AV.
I'm pretty sure such a LS doesn't even exist.
Only because the PS2 version is more prevalent there than the PC version is.
----------------------------
Revenge of Dynamis - BRACE FOR IMPACT Dreamsicle Studio - Computer Lineup
Push Button In Case Of Fail
NaNoWriMo 2009: 37,551/50,000
Posting from the Ban Katie bandwagon
Yeah, maybe JP, but do you really think any of them made a rule barring PC players from joining and somehow managed to enforce it? >_>
Then again, it IS the Japanese. Who knows what sort of antics they get into?
Edited, Nov 6th 2009 7:43pm by Fynlar
Then again, it IS the Japanese. Who knows what sort of antics they get into?
Edited, Nov 6th 2009 7:43pm by Fynlar
Posting from Lakshmi
Posted: Nov 7th 2009 1:23am | IP: Logged | Reply to this
MDenham wrote:
Fynlar wrote:
Quote:
I'm pretty sure some LS with all PS2/XBOX360 players have already attempted to fight JoL and AV.
I'm pretty sure such a LS doesn't even exist.
Only because the PS2 version is more prevalent there than the PC version is.
But we all know that the Japanese have already beat AV. They are just keeping it secret.... OP may be on to something...
I'm joking.
Posted: Nov 7th 2009 1:29am | IP: Logged | Reply to this
Only a guido may defeat Absolute Virtue.
Mets Season: 70-92 

----------------------------
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.

Posting from ... where on Earth am I now?
QSlick wrote:
Preview: the silliest, most convoluted, AV "theory" ever?
There have been lots of "theories" about defeating Absolute Virtue over the years. Here's mine. This'll take a while, though; so grab a sandwich or something.....
...okay, here goes.
This theory started fairly simply. The name of the creature itself. Absolute Virtue. To me, that means that he is the paragon of morality, honesty, and fair play. Which led me to believe, you will not defeat this creature by cheating.
There's been lots of discussion amongst the player population about whether Windower plugins are considered cheating. However, the opinion of the playerbase--for the purposes of this topic--is irrelevant. SE considers it cheating. And that's what matters here.
But how can they TELL if you're cheating or not? Most of the popular plugins are--for all intents and purposes--undetectable since they only display information that the servers send you anyway.
But then I thought; "what about the other way around"? Do any of them change the way the players send info TO the server? And is it in a way that SE can detect? SE catches bots all the time, don't they?
Now, this part of my theory is definitely the weakest link; since I'm not exactly well-versed in Internet mechanics--I fully expect this part to be shot down in a blaze of technical knowledge. But this is(?) a Friday thread; so have fun with it.
I think it has something to do with Windower macros. Those wonderful things that allow you to make macros of more than six lines (at least that's how I've come to understand it). Now, what do you NEED more than six lines at a time for?
The only thing I can think of (and feel free to clue me in if I'm offbase here) is massive equip swapping. If not for that; I don't think anyone would really need long macros for anything. Whether equip-swaps of this level are necessary or not is another topic altogether; so I won't digress by going down that road.
But this is the "key" to my theory. When you fire off one of these macros, you're sending a huge amount of equip-change commands at a speed and efficiency that cannot be matched by any console-using player. And this is what's being detected. (DISCLAIMER: If it's not totally obvious by this paragraph, I play this game on a console and while I certainly COULD use my PC for it, I choose not to.)
And there are probably not many fights where gear-optimization is considered more "necessary" than the Jailer Of Love fight. (DISCLAIMER: I've only participated in one JOL fight, and my role there was not exactly involved. So I freely admit, I don't have a lot of experience to base this claim on. Happy Friday?)
So, in a way to "catch" and "punish" plug-in users without outright banning them--because we all know what the outcome of banning them would be--Absolute Virtue was created to slap these evil-doers across the face and leave them running for their moogles.
But after a while, SE probably decided "what if NO ONE in the group fighting it is cheating in this way? Maybe we should devise a way to 'reward' their honesty and give the wrong-doers a chance to repent." The infamous "video" of them beating AV is one of the things that resulted from this. Giving AV a loot-pool was another.
One other result was whenever someone devised a way to beat AV, they quickly fixed it. Most of these have been the result of glitches, but the most recent one I remember (KC-DRK zergs) certainly feeds into this theory (beat AV even by cheating).
So, the end product of this entire thing is, next time you use that JOL pop-set; DON'T USE WINDOWER MACROS AT ALL. It might mean your parsers will show some lol-worthy damage numbers or something or other; but in the name of honesty and fair-play, it just might be worth it.
And if it's not, just keep telling yourself that this was only a Happy Friday thread. ("Holy ****, that Q is so out of his mind!")
Just in case you were wondering, I don't REALLY consider my theory to be likely. Mainly because, even with my limited knowledge; I can think of at least two ways to "fool" the detection scheme.
There have been lots of "theories" about defeating Absolute Virtue over the years. Here's mine. This'll take a while, though; so grab a sandwich or something.....
...okay, here goes.
This theory started fairly simply. The name of the creature itself. Absolute Virtue. To me, that means that he is the paragon of morality, honesty, and fair play. Which led me to believe, you will not defeat this creature by cheating.
There's been lots of discussion amongst the player population about whether Windower plugins are considered cheating. However, the opinion of the playerbase--for the purposes of this topic--is irrelevant. SE considers it cheating. And that's what matters here.
But how can they TELL if you're cheating or not? Most of the popular plugins are--for all intents and purposes--undetectable since they only display information that the servers send you anyway.
But then I thought; "what about the other way around"? Do any of them change the way the players send info TO the server? And is it in a way that SE can detect? SE catches bots all the time, don't they?
Now, this part of my theory is definitely the weakest link; since I'm not exactly well-versed in Internet mechanics--I fully expect this part to be shot down in a blaze of technical knowledge. But this is(?) a Friday thread; so have fun with it.
I think it has something to do with Windower macros. Those wonderful things that allow you to make macros of more than six lines (at least that's how I've come to understand it). Now, what do you NEED more than six lines at a time for?
The only thing I can think of (and feel free to clue me in if I'm offbase here) is massive equip swapping. If not for that; I don't think anyone would really need long macros for anything. Whether equip-swaps of this level are necessary or not is another topic altogether; so I won't digress by going down that road.
But this is the "key" to my theory. When you fire off one of these macros, you're sending a huge amount of equip-change commands at a speed and efficiency that cannot be matched by any console-using player. And this is what's being detected. (DISCLAIMER: If it's not totally obvious by this paragraph, I play this game on a console and while I certainly COULD use my PC for it, I choose not to.)
And there are probably not many fights where gear-optimization is considered more "necessary" than the Jailer Of Love fight. (DISCLAIMER: I've only participated in one JOL fight, and my role there was not exactly involved. So I freely admit, I don't have a lot of experience to base this claim on. Happy Friday?)
So, in a way to "catch" and "punish" plug-in users without outright banning them--because we all know what the outcome of banning them would be--Absolute Virtue was created to slap these evil-doers across the face and leave them running for their moogles.
But after a while, SE probably decided "what if NO ONE in the group fighting it is cheating in this way? Maybe we should devise a way to 'reward' their honesty and give the wrong-doers a chance to repent." The infamous "video" of them beating AV is one of the things that resulted from this. Giving AV a loot-pool was another.
One other result was whenever someone devised a way to beat AV, they quickly fixed it. Most of these have been the result of glitches, but the most recent one I remember (KC-DRK zergs) certainly feeds into this theory (beat AV even by cheating).
So, the end product of this entire thing is, next time you use that JOL pop-set; DON'T USE WINDOWER MACROS AT ALL. It might mean your parsers will show some lol-worthy damage numbers or something or other; but in the name of honesty and fair-play, it just might be worth it.
And if it's not, just keep telling yourself that this was only a Happy Friday thread. ("Holy ****, that Q is so out of his mind!")
Just in case you were wondering, I don't REALLY consider my theory to be likely. Mainly because, even with my limited knowledge; I can think of at least two ways to "fool" the detection scheme.
But hasn't it been proven the exact other way around? I thought the way to beat AV (or at least lock the 2 hours) has been established - to use the same 2 hour as soon as she does. But the window in which you can do this is so small that you need to use 3rd party tools to time it right.
So in essence you have to beat the paragon of good with cheating.
Then you just have to deal with Meteor...
Isn't that correct?
Edited, Nov 7th 2009 2:01am by jtftaru
----------------------------
Soloing Wings of Fury - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHfrxla41jo Where is the love? - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTJBxroWtMU&feature=related
Posting from UK
Posted: Nov 7th 2009 2:05am | IP: Logged | Reply to this
You don't need to use 3rd-party tools to time the 2hrs appropriately, at least at first.
I want to say that the window narrows as the fight progresses, but I'm not sure that's accurate, and if it is, it may just be a "the window starts at X amount of time, and every time one's successfully locked, it shortens to the amount of time you took of the last window" sort of thing, in which case trying to lock 2hrs as late as possible in the window would be ideal.
However: that's entirely hypothetical and probably wrong. Do not take this as a substitute for actual legal advice from an actual lawyer.
Dreamsicle Studio - Computer Lineup
Push Button In Case Of Fail
NaNoWriMo 2009: 37,551/50,000
I want to say that the window narrows as the fight progresses, but I'm not sure that's accurate, and if it is, it may just be a "the window starts at X amount of time, and every time one's successfully locked, it shortens to the amount of time you took of the last window" sort of thing, in which case trying to lock 2hrs as late as possible in the window would be ideal.
However: that's entirely hypothetical and probably wrong. Do not take this as a substitute for actual legal advice from an actual lawyer.
----------------------------
Revenge of Dynamis - BRACE FOR IMPACT Dreamsicle Studio - Computer Lineup
Push Button In Case Of Fail
NaNoWriMo 2009: 37,551/50,000
Posting from the Ban Katie bandwagon
Posted: Nov 7th 2009 2:19am | IP: Logged | Reply to this
MDenham wrote:
You don't need to use 3rd-party tools to time the 2hrs appropriately, at least at first.
I want to say that the window narrows as the fight progresses, but I'm not sure that's accurate, and if it is, it may just be a "the window starts at X amount of time, and every time one's successfully locked, it shortens to the amount of time you took of the last window" sort of thing, in which case trying to lock 2hrs as late as possible in the window would be ideal.
However: that's entirely hypothetical and probably wrong. Do not take this as a substitute for actual legal advice from an actual lawyer.
I want to say that the window narrows as the fight progresses, but I'm not sure that's accurate, and if it is, it may just be a "the window starts at X amount of time, and every time one's successfully locked, it shortens to the amount of time you took of the last window" sort of thing, in which case trying to lock 2hrs as late as possible in the window would be ideal.
However: that's entirely hypothetical and probably wrong. Do not take this as a substitute for actual legal advice from an actual lawyer.
Well the only 2 hour you really need to worry about is Benediction. You get that locked, that's the main one.
----------------------------
Soloing Wings of Fury - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHfrxla41jo Where is the love? - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTJBxroWtMU&feature=related
Posting from UK
Posted: Nov 7th 2009 5:22am | IP: Logged | Reply to this
Quote:
Then again, it IS the Japanese. Who knows what sort of antics they get into?
I laughed so hard during that video I pee'd myself.
----------------------------
"You're like the friggin Steve Irwin of finding sh*tty ass parties." lulz Posting from in my closet plotting my revenge..
Posted: Nov 7th 2009 8:02am | IP: Logged | Reply to this
Quote:
SE catches bots all the time, don't they?
lolno.
The only time SE catches botters is if they either admit it, or they're botting afk.
----------------------------
75RDMBLMBRDNINRNG72(oc)DRK
http://ffxirog.livejournal.com lollj
Quote:
e-terrorists? e-vigilantes? Lists, threats, swear words? I'm even reading comparisons to real life justice and laws. E-Law and E-Order: Vana'diel edition.
Quote:
If you constantly defend shit gear and whine incessantly about elitists, you are guaranteed to have neither skill nor gear.
Posting from 127.0.0.1
Posted: Nov 7th 2009 6:15pm | IP: Logged | Reply to this
Princess ThePsychoticOne wrote:
Quote:
SE catches bots all the time, don't they?
The only time SE catches botters is if they either admit it, or they're botting afk.
----------------------------
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.

Posting from ... where on Earth am I now?
Posted: Nov 7th 2009 7:03pm | IP: Logged | Reply to this
The sad part is people still believe SE bans people for botting because they detected the bot. If the false bannings proved nothing else, it proved SE doesn't have a @#%^ing clue or means of filtering the real problems from the imagined ones.
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/pawkeshup
Viddler: http://www.viddler.com/explore/pawkeshup/
UStream: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/pawkeshup-s-gaming-stream
Blog: http://pawkeshup.blogspot.com
----------------------------
MyBrute: http://pawkeshup.mybrute.com YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/pawkeshup
Viddler: http://www.viddler.com/explore/pawkeshup/
UStream: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/pawkeshup-s-gaming-stream
Blog: http://pawkeshup.blogspot.com
Posting from a computer, DUH!
Posted: Nov 8th 2009 3:36am | IP: Logged | Reply to this
QSlick wrote:
This is a Friday thread.....or is it?
This is not a Friday Thread.
----------------------------
Theytak, Siren Server [MNK75][WAR75][PUP75][PLD72][THF45][RNG34][COR27]
LOLGAXE IS MY ETERNAL RIVAL!
Twice, His Excellency Soracloud wrote:
You magnificent bastard.
Pikko wrote:
Jinte's such a bully.
lolgaxe wrote:
Its not fair that just because I have text with someone of the same gender I can't Computer Adopt.
Posting from a Marvelous Garden Party
Posted: Nov 9th 2009 1:53am | IP: Logged | Reply to this
Quote:
One other result was whenever someone devised a way to beat AV, they quickly fixed it. Most of these have been the result of glitches, but the most recent one I remember (KC-DRK zergs) certainly feeds into this theory (beat AV even by cheating).
Except Kclub DRK zerging isnt cheating.
----------------------------
THF 75 Wood working 50
Posted: Nov 9th 2009 11:58am | IP: Logged | Reply to this
Quote:
Except Kclub DRK zerging isnt cheating.
By itself, no.
What I meant by it was you could mass-equip-swap and still beat it.
----------------------------
Pluh. Chocoblo wrote:
I wouldn't mind being able to tie two Taru MNKs together and attack with the ferocity of a pair of monkchuks.
Posting from The United States of Who Gives A S---?
23 Replies (Search Forums)
Forum by ZAM Network v2.7
- Allakhazam's Forums
- Final Fantasy XI Forums
- Final Fantasy XI General Discussion Forum
- This is a Friday thread.....or is it?




